Oden v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Oden v. State

106 So. 922, 21 Ala. App. 687

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 24, 1925

Docket5 Div. 583.

StatusPublished

This text of 106 So. 922 (Oden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oden v. State, 106 So. 922, 21 Ala. App. 687 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

BRIGKEN, P. J.

This appellant was convicted for the offense of violating the prohibition laws of the state. In default of the fine, he was sentenced to 20 days hard labor for •the county and 95 days to pay the costs. The court added 6 months’ hard labor for the county. The cause was tried in the circuit court on April 3, 1925, and from the judgment of conviction he appealed. The certificate of appeal was filed with the clerk of this court on April 15, 1925. The appeal has never been perfected, and is now submitted upon motion of the state to dismiss the appeal. Motion granted- Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRIGKEN, P. J.

This appellant was convicted for the offense of violating the prohibition laws of the state. In default of the fine, he was sentenced to 20 days hard labor for •the county and 95 days to pay the costs. The court added 6 months’ hard labor for the county. The cause was tried in the circuit court on April 3, 1925, and from the judgment of conviction he appealed. The certificate of appeal was filed with the clerk of this court on April 15, 1925. The appeal has never been perfected, and is now submitted upon motion of the state to dismiss the appeal. Motion granted- Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 So. 922, 21 Ala. App. 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oden-v-state-alactapp-1925.