Oden v. Social Security Administration

668 F. App'x 461
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 29, 2016·No. No. 16-1095·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher William Oden appeals the magistrate judge’s orders granting the Acting Commissioner’s motion to remand and denying Oden’s motion for reconsideration. After reviewing the record, we affirm for the reasons cited by the magistrate judge. Oden v. Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 3:15-cv-00065-DJN (E.D. Va. Oct. 1, 2015; Nov. 18, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oden v. Social Security Administration, 668 F. App'x 461 (4th Cir. 2016).

668 F. App'x 461 (Oden v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.