Home/Supreme Court/Oden v. Coco

Oden v. Coco

249 U.S. 587, 39 S. Ct. 386, 63 L. Ed. 790, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1694
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 14, 1919
DocketNo. 704
StatusPublished

This text of 249 U.S. 587 (Oden v. Coco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oden v. Coco, 249 U.S. 587, 39 S. Ct. 386, 63 L. Ed. 790, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1694 (1919).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for Want of jurisdiction upon the authority of; (1) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216, 218. (2) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, &c., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599; Municipal Securities Corporation v. Kansas City, 246 U. S. 63, 69; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Hanley
205 U.S. 225 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Goodrich v. Ferris
214 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Brolan v. United States
236 U.S. 216 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Municipal Securities Corp. v. Kansas City
246 U.S. 63 (Supreme Court, 1918)
Bilby v. Stewart
246 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 U.S. 587, 39 S. Ct. 386, 63 L. Ed. 790, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oden-v-coco-scotus-1919.