O'Dell v. Stone

Supreme Court of Florida

O'Dell v. Stone

150 So. 883, 112 Fla. 679, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2336

DecidedNovember 13, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 150 So. 883 (O'Dell v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Dell v. Stone, 150 So. 883, 112 Fla. 679, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2336 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case Mr. Chief Justice Davis, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the amount of bail' fixed by. the Circuit Judge' at $25,000.00, on the record as here made, is' excessive and unwarranted by the facts and circumstances appearing of record as the basis for the Circuit Judge’s judgment reducing the County Judge’s bail fixed at $50,000.00 to the amount of the Circuit Court’s order fixing bail .at $25,000.00. Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that the judgment of the Circuit Court should not be disturbed. In these circumstances the judgment must be affirmed by an equal division of the Court and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, BrowfI and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this case Mr. Chief Justice Davis, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the amount of bail' fixed by. the Circuit Judge' at $25,000.00, on the record as here made, is' excessive and unwarranted by the facts and circumstances appearing of record as the basis for the Circuit Judge’s judgment reducing the County Judge’s bail fixed at $50,000.00 to the amount of the Circuit Court’s order fixing bail .at $25,000.00. Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that the judgment of the Circuit Court should not be disturbed. In these circumstances the judgment must be affirmed by an equal division of the Court and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, BrowfI and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 So. 883, 112 Fla. 679, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odell-v-stone-fla-1933.