O'DELL v. Doychak

District Court of Appeal of Florida

O'DELL v. Doychak

1 So. 3d 340, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1778, 2009 WL 152713

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 23, 2009

Docket5D07-820

StatusPublished

This text of 1 So. 3d 340 (O'DELL v. Doychak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'DELL v. Doychak, 1 So. 3d 340, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1778, 2009 WL 152713 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

GRIFFIN, J.

Appellant, William O’Dell, pro se, appeals a final judgment rescinding several deeds dated July 16, 1999. The issues Appellant raises on appeal involve a claim of denial of due process, denial of discovery prior to trial and error by the trial court in denying summary judgment as to the first count. The trial court issued an excellent order in this case, the factual basis for which we have no basis to disagree, 1 and we find no error in its legal conclusions. Appellant’s claims on appeal either lack legal merit or factual support. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

1

. The record does not contain a transcript of the trial proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRIFFIN, J.

Appellant, William O’Dell, pro se, appeals a final judgment rescinding several deeds dated July 16, 1999. The issues Appellant raises on appeal involve a claim of denial of due process, denial of discovery prior to trial and error by the trial court in denying summary judgment as to the first count. The trial court issued an excellent order in this case, the factual basis for which we have no basis to disagree, 1 and we find no error in its legal conclusions. Appellant’s claims on appeal either lack legal merit or factual support. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

1

. The record does not contain a transcript of the trial proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 So. 3d 340, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1778, 2009 WL 152713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odell-v-doychak-fladistctapp-2009.