Odell Marshall, and v. Lawrence Putnam, And
This text of 600 F.2d 1331 (Odell Marshall, and v. Lawrence Putnam, And) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Odell MARSHALL, Petitioner and Appellant,
v.
Lawrence PUTNAM, Defendant and Appellee.
No. 78-2718.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
July 2, 1979.
Barry Tarlow, Law Offices, Los Angeles, Cal., on briefs, for petitioner and appellant.
Mitchell A. Mars, Atty., U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant and appellee.
Before HUFSTEDLER, ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and EAST,* Senior District Judge.
ORDER
The judgment is affirmed. The issue was decided adversely to the appellant by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Addonizio, --- U.S. ----, 99 S.Ct. 2235, 60 L.Ed.2d 805 (1979).
AFFIRMED.
Hon. William G. East, Senior District Judge, United States District Court for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
600 F.2d 1331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odell-marshall-and-v-lawrence-putnam-and-ca9-1979.