Oddo v. Presser
592 S.E.2d 195, 358 N.C. 128, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 9
Opinion
As to the issue of compensatory damages, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion. We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals as to all remaining issues.
REVERSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oddo v. Presser, 592 S.E.2d 195, 358 N.C. 128, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 9 (N.C. 2004).
592 S.E.2d 195 (Oddo v. Presser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. Clark
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2021
Boileau v. Seagrave
667 S.E.2d 341 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
Bailey v. Faulkner
940 So. 2d 247 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2006)