Oddo v. Asbestos Corp.

90 So. 3d 1034, 2012 WL 2549818, 2012 La. LEXIS 1922
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 20, 2012·No. No. 2012-CC-1398·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

11 Considering the unique facts of this case, we find the district court abused its discretion in denying relator’s motion for continuance. Accordingly, the writ is granted, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the case is remanded to the district court, which is instructed to grant relator’s motion for continuance.

KNOLL, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oddo v. Asbestos Corp., 90 So. 3d 1034, 2012 WL 2549818, 2012 La. LEXIS 1922 (La. 2012).

90 So. 3d 1034 (Oddo v. Asbestos Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.