Odd Fellows' Sav. & Commercial Bank v. Harrigan
This text of 53 Cal. 229 (Odd Fellows' Sav. & Commercial Bank v. Harrigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Whatever may be the correct interpretation of the decree as originally rendered, so far as the right of the appellant to redeem is involved, it appears that the commissioners subsequently [230]*230reported to the Court that they had delivered a deed to the purchaser upon making the sale.
This action of the commissioners was thereupon approved by the Court below, and an order was entered, confirming their proceedings. From this order no appeal appears to have been taken, and we think that the effect of the order of confirmation, irrespective of the language of the .decree, was to deny the right of the appellant to redeem from the sale.
Order affirmed. Bemittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 Cal. 229, 1878 Cal. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odd-fellows-sav-commercial-bank-v-harrigan-cal-1878.