ODC v. Thomas Mark Shultz
This text of ODC v. Thomas Mark Shultz (ODC v. Thomas Mark Shultz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2855 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 113 DB 2021 : : Attorney Registration No. 73163 v. : : (York County) : THOMAS MARK SHULTZ, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 4th day of March, 2022, upon consideration of the
Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint Petition
in Support of Discipline on Consent is granted, and Thomas Mark Shultz is suspended
on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one year and one day.
Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the
Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ODC v. Thomas Mark Shultz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odc-v-thomas-mark-shultz-pa-2022.