ODC v. Susan Steinthal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 27, 2019·No. 2607 DD3·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2607 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 156 DB 2018 : v. : New York Bar Registration No. 2747517 : SUSAN STEINTHAL, : (Out of State) : Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2019, upon consideration of the

Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint Petition

in Support of Discipline on Consent is granted. Susan Steinthal is suspended on consent

from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of six months. Consistent with the Joint

Petition, Respondent shall not apply for admission to the Bar of this Commonwealth for

two years from the date of this Order. She shall comply with all the provisions of

Pa.R.D.E. 217, and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Justice Mundy dissents and would deny the joint petition for discipline on consent

in favor of a six-month suspension, with no additional conditions.

Justice Todd and Justice Wecht join this dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ODC v. Susan Steinthal, (Pa. 2019).

ODC v. Susan Steinthal (ODC v. Susan Steinthal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.