ODC v. Peter Jude Caroff
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2600 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 43 DB 2019 v. : : Attorney Registration No. 94543 PETER JUDE CAROFF, : : (Allegheny County) Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2019, upon consideration of the Recommendation
of the Disciplinary Board, Respondent’s petition for review, and the Office of Disciplinary
Counsel’s response, the petition for review is denied, and Peter Jude Caroff is placed on
temporary suspension until further action by this Court. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(5). He
shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.
Respondent’s rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this Order and to
request accelerated disposition of charges underlying this Order are specifically
preserved. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(4) and (f)(6).
The Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline with the meaning of
Pa.R.D.E. 402, pertaining to confidentiality.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ODC v. Peter Jude Caroff (ODC v. Peter Jude Caroff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.