ODC v. Mary Ellen Chajkowski
This text of ODC v. Mary Ellen Chajkowski (ODC v. Mary Ellen Chajkowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2364 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 81 DB 2015 : v. : Attorney Registration No. 86611 : MARY ELLEN CHAJKOWSKI, : (Out of State) : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 2018, upon review of Respondent’s answer to
the directive of February 22, 2018, the Rule is made absolute, and Respondent Mary
Ellen Chajkowski is held in contempt for willful violation of this Court’s Order dated June
1, 2017. Respondent shall immediately cease and desist and be enjoined from any and
all activities in connection with the practice of law in this Commonwealth.
Petitioner’s request for an imposition of a daily fine is denied without prejudice to
seek such relief before the Disciplinary Board.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ODC v. Mary Ellen Chajkowski, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odc-v-mary-ellen-chajkowski-pa-2018.