ODC v. Marlene Evelyn Joseph

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

ODC v. Marlene Evelyn Joseph

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 23, 2017·No. ODC v. Marlene Evelyn Joseph - No. 2367 DD3·Published

Opinion

lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A

OFF|CE OF D|SC|PL|NARY COUNSEL, : No. 2367 DisCip|inary DoCket No. 3

Petitioner : File No. 02-16-401 v. : Attorney Registration No. 36435 l\/|ARLENE EVELYN JOSEPH : (l\/|ontgomery County) Respondent ORDER PER CUR|AM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of l\/|arch, 2017, upon consideration of the Certificate of Admission of Disa|oility loy Attorney, l\/|arlene Evelyn Joseph is immediately transferred to inactive status for an indefinite period and until further Order of the Court per Pa.R.D.E. 301 (e). She shall comply with all of the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

All pending disciplinary proceedings shall loe held in abeyance except for the

perpetuation of testimony and the preservation of documentary evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A

OFF|CE OF D|SC|PL|NARY COUNSEL, : No. 2367 DisCip|inary DoCket No. 3

Petitioner : File No. 02-16-401 v. : Attorney Registration No. 36435 l\/|ARLENE EVELYN JOSEPH : (l\/|ontgomery County) Respondent ORDER PER CUR|AM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of l\/|arch, 2017, upon consideration of the Certificate of Admission of Disa|oility loy Attorney, l\/|arlene Evelyn Joseph is immediately transferred to inactive status for an indefinite period and until further Order of the Court per Pa.R.D.E. 301 (e). She shall comply with all of the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

All pending disciplinary proceedings shall loe held in abeyance except for the

perpetuation of testimony and the preservation of documentary evidence.

ODC v. Marlene Evelyn Joseph, (Pa. 2017).

Pincite

ODC v. Marlene Evelyn Joseph (ODC v. Marlene Evelyn Joseph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.