ODC v. Mark T. Schappell
This text of ODC v. Mark T. Schappell (ODC v. Mark T. Schappell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 1892 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 172 DB 2012 v. : : Attorney Registration No. 83524 MARK T. SCHAPPELL, : Respondent : (Lebanon County)
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2014, upon consideration of the
Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated September
12, 2014, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted pursuant
to Rule 215(g), Pa.R.D.E., and it is
ORDERED that Mark T. Schappell is suspended on consent from the Bar of this
Commonwealth for a period of five years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of
Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ODC v. Mark T. Schappell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odc-v-mark-t-schappell-pa-2014.