ODC v. Mark Curtis Hanamirian

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

ODC v. Mark Curtis Hanamirian

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 13, 2019·No. 2613 DD3·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2613 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 224 DB 2018 : v. : Attorney Registration No. 38843 : MARK CURTIS HANAMIRIAN, : (Philadelphia) : Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 13th day of June, 2019, upon consideration of the Verified

Statement of Resignation, Mark Curtis Hanamirian is disbarred on consent from the Bar

of this Commonwealth, see Pa.R.D.E. 215, and he shall comply with the provisions of

Pa.R.D.E. 217. Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to

Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2613 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 224 DB 2018 : v. : Attorney Registration No. 38843 : MARK CURTIS HANAMIRIAN, : (Philadelphia) : Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 13th day of June, 2019, upon consideration of the Verified

Statement of Resignation, Mark Curtis Hanamirian is disbarred on consent from the Bar

of this Commonwealth, see Pa.R.D.E. 215, and he shall comply with the provisions of

Pa.R.D.E. 217. Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to

Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

ODC v. Mark Curtis Hanamirian, (Pa. 2019).

Pincite

ODC v. Mark Curtis Hanamirian (ODC v. Mark Curtis Hanamirian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.