ODC v. Mark B. Peduto
This text of ODC v. Mark B. Peduto (ODC v. Mark B. Peduto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A
OFF|CE OF D|SC|PL|NARY COUNSEL, : No. 2190 Discip|inary DoCket No. 3
Petitioner : No. 75 DB 2015 v. : Attorney Registration No. 62923 |\/|ARK B. PEDUTO, : (A||egheny County) Respondent ORDER
PER CUR|AM
AND NOW, this 24th day of Fe|oruary, 2017, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Three-|\/|em|oer Pane| of the Discip|inary Board, the Joint Petition in Support of Discip|ine on Consent is granted, and |\/|ark B. Peduto is suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwea|th for a period of three years, retroactive to Ju|y 16, 2015. He sha|| comply With a|| provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.
Respondent sha|| pay the costs incurred loy the Discip|inary Board in the
investigation and prosecution of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ODC v. Mark B. Peduto, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odc-v-mark-b-peduto-pa-2017.