ODC v. Mark B. Peduto
Opinion
lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A
OFF|CE OF D|SC|PL|NARY COUNSEL, : No. 2190 Discip|inary DoCket No. 3
Petitioner : No. 75 DB 2015 v. : Attorney Registration No. 62923 |\/|ARK B. PEDUTO, : (A||egheny County) Respondent ORDER
PER CUR|AM
AND NOW, this 24th day of Fe|oruary, 2017, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Three-|\/|em|oer Pane| of the Discip|inary Board, the Joint Petition in Support of Discip|ine on Consent is granted, and |\/|ark B. Peduto is suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwea|th for a period of three years, retroactive to Ju|y 16, 2015. He sha|| comply With a|| provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.
Respondent sha|| pay the costs incurred loy the Discip|inary Board in the
investigation and prosecution of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ODC v. Mark B. Peduto (ODC v. Mark B. Peduto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.