ODC v. Mark B. Peduto

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 24, 2017·No. ODC v. Mark B. Peduto - No. 2190 DD3·Published

Opinion

lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A

OFF|CE OF D|SC|PL|NARY COUNSEL, : No. 2190 Discip|inary DoCket No. 3

Petitioner : No. 75 DB 2015 v. : Attorney Registration No. 62923 |\/|ARK B. PEDUTO, : (A||egheny County) Respondent ORDER

PER CUR|AM

AND NOW, this 24th day of Fe|oruary, 2017, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Three-|\/|em|oer Pane| of the Discip|inary Board, the Joint Petition in Support of Discip|ine on Consent is granted, and |\/|ark B. Peduto is suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwea|th for a period of three years, retroactive to Ju|y 16, 2015. He sha|| comply With a|| provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

Respondent sha|| pay the costs incurred loy the Discip|inary Board in the

investigation and prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ODC v. Mark B. Peduto, (Pa. 2017).

ODC v. Mark B. Peduto (ODC v. Mark B. Peduto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.