ODC v. Kathleen Granahan Kane
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2202 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : Board File No. C3-15-558 v. : : Attorney Registration No. 69680 KATHLEEN GRANAHAN KANE, : Respondent : (Dauphin County)
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2015, upon consideration of the
responses to a Rule to Show Cause why Kathleen Granahan Kane should not be
placed on temporary suspension, the Rule is made absolute; Respondent Kathleen
Granahan Kane is placed on temporary suspension; and, to the extent applicable, she
shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.
Respondent’s rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this order
pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(4), and to request accelerated disposition of charges
underlying this order pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(6), are specifically preserved.
This order should not be construed as removing Respondent from elected office
and is limited to the temporary suspension of her license to practice law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ODC v. Kathleen Granahan Kane (ODC v. Kathleen Granahan Kane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.