ODC v. Joseph J. Carlin
This text of ODC v. Joseph J. Carlin (ODC v. Joseph J. Carlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2082 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : v. : No. 72 DB 2014 : : JOSEPH J. CARLIN, : Attorney Registration No. 3819 Respondent : (Montgomery County)
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 6th day of August, 2014, upon consideration of the
Certificate of Admission of Disability by Attorney that the respondent is suffering from a
disabling condition which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense
to disciplinary charges brought against him, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Joseph J. Carlin is immediately transferred to inactive
status pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa.R.D.E., for an indefinite period and until further Order
of the Court, and he shall comply with Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. All pending disciplinary
proceedings shall be held in abeyance, except for the perpetuation of testimony and the
preservation of documentary evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ODC v. Joseph J. Carlin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odc-v-joseph-j-carlin-pa-2014.