ODC v. Eugene Daniel Lucas
This text of ODC v. Eugene Daniel Lucas (ODC v. Eugene Daniel Lucas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2875 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 50 DB 2022 v. : : Attorney Registration No. 34844 EUGENE DANIEL LUCAS, : : (Lackawanna County) Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 2022, Respondent’s Petition for Extension is
DENIED. Moreover, in the absence of a response to this Court’s Rule to Show Cause
why Respondent should not be placed on temporary suspension, the Rule is made
absolute. It is ordered that:
1. Respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by
this Court;
2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217;
3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County
shall enter such orders as may be necessary to protect the rights of Respondent’s clients
or fiduciary entities with which he is involved, see Pa.R.D.E. 217(g); and
4. All financial institutions in which Respondent holds fiduciary funds shall freeze
such accounts pending further action. Respondent’s rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this order and to
request accelerated disposition of charges underlying this order pursuant to Pa.R.D.E.
208(f)(6) are specifically preserved.
This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline pertaining to
confidentiality. See Pa.R.D.E. 402.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ODC v. Eugene Daniel Lucas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odc-v-eugene-daniel-lucas-pa-2022.