ODC v. Eugene Daniel Lucas

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 6, 2022·No. 2875 DD3·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2875 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 :

Petitioner : No. 50 DB 2022 v. :

: Attorney Registration No. 34844 EUGENE DANIEL LUCAS, :

: (Lackawanna County)

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 2022, Respondent’s Petition for Extension is

DENIED. Moreover, in the absence of a response to this Court’s Rule to Show Cause why Respondent should not be placed on temporary suspension, the Rule is made absolute. It is ordered that:

1. Respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by this Court;

2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217;

3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County shall enter such orders as may be necessary to protect the rights of Respondent’s clients or fiduciary entities with which he is involved, see Pa.R.D.E. 217(g); and 4. All financial institutions in which Respondent holds fiduciary funds shall freeze such accounts pending further action.

Respondent’s rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this order and to request accelerated disposition of charges underlying this order pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(6) are specifically preserved.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline pertaining to confidentiality. See Pa.R.D.E. 402.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ODC v. Eugene Daniel Lucas, (Pa. 2022).

ODC v. Eugene Daniel Lucas (ODC v. Eugene Daniel Lucas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.