ODC v. Eric William Wassel

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 9, 2018
Docket2465 DD3
StatusPublished

This text of ODC v. Eric William Wassel (ODC v. Eric William Wassel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ODC v. Eric William Wassel, (Pa. 2018).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2465 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 43 DB 2018 : v. : Attorney Registration No. 77632 : ERIC WILLIAM WASSEL, : (Luzerne County) : Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 2018, upon consideration of the

Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint

Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is granted, and Eric William Wassel is

suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of two years.

The suspension is stayed in its entirety, and he is placed on probation for a period of

two years, subject to the following conditions:

1. Respondent shall not engage in conduct that is in violation of any federal, state

or local statute or ordinance that provides for a possible sentence of

imprisonment;

2. Respondent shall report to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel if he is charged

with violations of any federal, state or local statute or ordinance that provides for

a possible sentence of imprisonment;

3. Respondent shall not engage in conduct that is a violation of the Pennsylvania

Rules of Professional Conduct or the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement; more specifically, Respondent has escrowed the diverted funds

regardless of his view or the merits of the dispute;

4. Respondent shall litigate the fee dispute with Fellerman & Ciarimboli Law Firm

in good faith and comply with the terms of any settlement or final judgment; and

5. Respondent shall not engage in conduct that is in violation of the

corresponding Rules of Professional Conduct in any other state where he obtains

or maintains a law license.

Further, Respondent shall pay the costs incurred by the Disciplinary Board in the

investigation and prosecution of this matter. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
ODC v. Eric William Wassel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odc-v-eric-william-wassel-pa-2018.