ODC v. Danielle M. Ross
This text of ODC v. Danielle M. Ross (ODC v. Danielle M. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2020 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 179 DB 2013 v. : : Attorney Registration No. 92346 DANIELLE M. ROSS, : Respondent : (Lackawanna County)
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 24th day of September, 2015, upon consideration of the
Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint
Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted, and Danielle M. Ross is
suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of twenty-six
months, retroactive to March 6, 2014, and she shall comply with all the provisions of
Pa.R.D.E. 217.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ODC v. Danielle M. Ross, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odc-v-danielle-m-ross-pa-2015.