ODC v. Craig Michael Kellerman
This text of ODC v. Craig Michael Kellerman (ODC v. Craig Michael Kellerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2163 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : v. : Board File Nos. C2-12-952; C2-14-457; : and C2-14-1013 : CRAIG MICHAEL KELLERMAN, : Attorney Registration No. 47119 Respondent : : (Montgomery County)
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 2nd day of June, 2015, an Order and Rule to Show Cause having
been entered by this Court on May 4, 2015, and upon consideration of the response
filed, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Rule is made absolute and, pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(2),
Respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by this
Court and he shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217; and
2. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery
County, in accordance with Pa.R.D.E. 217(g), shall enter such orders as may be
necessary to fully protect the rights of Respondent’s clients; and
3. All financial institutions in which Respondent holds fiduciary funds shall
freeze such accounts pending further action by a court of appropriate jurisdiction.
This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of
Pa.R.D.E. 402, pertaining to confidentiality.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ODC v. Craig Michael Kellerman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odc-v-craig-michael-kellerman-pa-2015.