ODC v. Annette Maria Oakley
This text of ODC v. Annette Maria Oakley (ODC v. Annette Maria Oakley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2387 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
Petitioner : No. 182 DB 2016
v. : Attorney Registration No. 91484
ANNETTE MARIA OAKLEY, : (Philadelphia)
Respondent
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 13th day of July, 2017, upon consideration of the
Recommendation of the Three -Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint
Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is granted, and Annette Maria Oakley is
suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one year.
Respondent is directed to comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217, and shall pay
the costs incurred by the Disciplinary Board in the investigation and prosecution of this
matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ODC v. Annette Maria Oakley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odc-v-annette-maria-oakley-pa-2017.