ODC v. Andrew Wilson Barbin
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2455 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 :
Petitioner : No. 176 DB 2017 :
v. : Attorney Registration No. 43571 :
ANDREW WILSON BARBIN, : (Cumberland County)
:
Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 12th day of October, 2018, a Rule having been entered by this
Court pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(h), directing Respondent to show cause why the stayed suspension order of this Court should not be modified as set forth by the Designated Board Member, and no response having been filed, the Rule is made absolute, and the probation order for Andrew Wilson Barbin will remain in effect until September 30, 2019.
Respondent shall maintain the records required by RPC 1.15(c) for all IOLTA accounts; he shall have those records certified by a CPA for accuracy and submit those records to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel by October 31, 2018; and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel shall confirm in writing to the Disciplinary Board that it is satisfied with the certified records. Failure to comply with these conditions shall result in Respondent’s immediate transfer to suspended status for the remainder of the one-year and one-day term.
Respondent is further directed to comply with all the remaining probationary conditions set forth in this Court’s order dated April 9, 2018.
Respondent shall pay the additional expenses incurred as a result of the probation violation proceedings. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ODC v. Andrew Wilson Barbin (ODC v. Andrew Wilson Barbin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.