ODC, Pet v. Wagner, R.
This text of ODC, Pet v. Wagner, R. (ODC, Pet v. Wagner, R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2729 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 80 DB 2020 : v. : Attorney Registration No. 326047 : ROSS PETER WAGNER, : (Out of State) : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 2020, upon consideration of the Recommendation
of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint Petition in Support of
Discipline on Consent is granted, and Ross Peter Wagner is suspended on consent from
the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of two years, with twelve months to be served.
The remaining suspension of twelve months is stayed, and Respondent is placed on
probation for a period of one year, subject to the following conditions:
1. Respondent shall continue treatment with Ms. Janet Coyle, LPC, or another
qualified mental healthcare provider;
2. Respondent shall comply with the treatment regimen prescribed by Ms.
Coyle or other mental healthcare provider;
3. Respondent shall file semi-annual reports with the Board Prothonotary, with
a copy to disciplinary counsel, from his treating mental healthcare provider
stating that he is continuing in treatment and is compliant with all treatment
recommendations; and
4. Respondent shall not violate the Rules of Professional Conduct. Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217, and pay costs
to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ODC, Pet v. Wagner, R., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odc-pet-v-wagner-r-pa-2020.