ODC, Pet v. Sean Andrew Potter
This text of ODC, Pet v. Sean Andrew Potter (ODC, Pet v. Sean Andrew Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2748 Disciplinary Docket No 3 : Petitioner : Board File Nos. C3-19-801; C3-19-902; : C3-19-942; C3-20-7; C3-20-221; v. : C3-20-229; C3-20-379; and C3-20-485 : SEAN ANDREW POTTER, : Attorney Registration No. 92102 : Respondent : (Perry County)
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2020, in the absence of a response to this
Court’s Rule to Show Cause why Respondent should not be placed on temporary
suspension, the Rule is made absolute, and it is provided that:
1. Respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by
this Court;
2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217; and
3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Perry County shall enter
such orders as may be necessary to protect the rights of Respondent’s clients or fiduciary
entities with which he is involved, see Pa.R.D.E. 217(g).
Respondent’s rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this order and to
request accelerated disposition of charges underlying this order pursuant to Pa.R.D.E.
208(f)(6), are specifically preserved.
This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline pertaining to
confidentiality. See Pa.R.D.E. 402.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ODC, Pet v. Sean Andrew Potter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odc-pet-v-sean-andrew-potter-pa-2020.