ODC, Pet v. Joseph D. Lento
This text of ODC, Pet v. Joseph D. Lento (ODC, Pet v. Joseph D. Lento) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
In the Matter of : No. 1940 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : : No. 5 DB 2013 JOSEPH D. LENTO : : Attorney Registration No. 208824 : PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT : (Philadelphia)
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
th AND NOW, this 4 day of September, 2014, on certification by the Disciplinary
Board that the respondent, Joseph D. Lento, who was suspended by Order of the Court
dated July 17, 2013, for a period of one year, has filed a verified statement showing
compliance with all the terms and conditions of the Order of Suspension and Rule 217,
Pa.R.D.E., and there being no other outstanding order of suspension or disbarment,
Joseph D. Lento is hereby reinstated to active status, effective immediately. Pursuant
to our Order of July 17, 2013, respondent is placed on probation for a period of one
year, subject to the conditions as set forth therein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ODC, Pet v. Joseph D. Lento, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odc-pet-v-joseph-d-lento-pa-2014.