ODC, Pet v. Dawn A. Segal
This text of ODC, Pet v. Dawn A. Segal (ODC, Pet v. Dawn A. Segal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE MATTER OF : No. 2586 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : DAWN A. SEGAL : No. 195 DB 2018 : : Attorney Registration No. 42469 : PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT : (Philadelphia)
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 13th day of May, 2021, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.
Petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and
processing of the Petition for Reinstatement. See Pa.R.D.E. 218(f).
Justice Dougherty did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ODC, Pet v. Dawn A. Segal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odc-pet-v-dawn-a-segal-pa-2021.