ODC, Pet v. Daniel Brian Hargrove

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

ODC, Pet v. Daniel Brian Hargrove

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 7, 2017·No. ODC, Pet v. Daniel Brian Hargrove - No. 1996 DD3·Published

Opinion

lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A

OFF|CE OF D|SC|PL|NARY COUNSEL, : No. 1996 DisCip|inary DoCket No. 3

Petitioner : No. 173 DB 2013 v. : Attorney Registration No. 52704 DAN|EL BR|AN HARGROVE, : (Allegheny County) Respondent ORDER

PER CUR|AM

AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2017, upon consideration of the Certificate of Admission of Disa|oility loy Attorney, Daniel Brian Hargrove is immediately transferred to inactive status for an indefinite period and until further Order of the Court per Pa.R.D.E. 301 (e). He shall comply with all of the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

All pending disciplinary proceedings shall loe held in aloeyance, except for the

perpetuation of testimony and the preservation of documentary evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A

OFF|CE OF D|SC|PL|NARY COUNSEL, : No. 1996 DisCip|inary DoCket No. 3

Petitioner : No. 173 DB 2013 v. : Attorney Registration No. 52704 DAN|EL BR|AN HARGROVE, : (Allegheny County) Respondent ORDER

PER CUR|AM

AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2017, upon consideration of the Certificate of Admission of Disa|oility loy Attorney, Daniel Brian Hargrove is immediately transferred to inactive status for an indefinite period and until further Order of the Court per Pa.R.D.E. 301 (e). He shall comply with all of the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

All pending disciplinary proceedings shall loe held in aloeyance, except for the

perpetuation of testimony and the preservation of documentary evidence.

ODC, Pet v. Daniel Brian Hargrove, (Pa. 2017).

Pincite

ODC, Pet v. Daniel Brian Hargrove (ODC, Pet v. Daniel Brian Hargrove) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.