ODC, Pet v. Charles C. Gentile
This text of ODC, Pet v. Charles C. Gentile (ODC, Pet v. Charles C. Gentile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A
|n the |\/|atter of : No. 1619 Discip|inary Docket No. 3 CHARLES G. GENT|LE : No. 87 DB 2010 PET|T|ON FOR RE|NSTATE|\/|ENT : Attorney Registration No. 18237 (Fayette County) ORDER PER CUR|AM
AND NOW, this 27th day of Apri|, 2017, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted. Petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and
processing of the Petition for Reinstatement. See Pa.R.D.E. 218(1).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ODC, Pet v. Charles C. Gentile, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odc-pet-v-charles-c-gentile-pa-2017.