ODC, Pet v. Andrew S. Hurwitz
This text of ODC, Pet v. Andrew S. Hurwitz (ODC, Pet v. Andrew S. Hurwitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2848 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : : No. 170 DB 2021 v. : : : Attorney Registration No. 67136 ANDREW S. HURWITZ, : : Respondent : (Montgomery County)
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 25th day of February, 2022, upon consideration of the
Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint Petition
in Support of Discipline on Consent is GRANTED, and Andrew S. Hurwitz is suspended
on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of six months. Respondent
shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary
Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ODC, Pet v. Andrew S. Hurwitz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odc-pet-v-andrew-s-hurwitz-pa-2022.