ODC, Pet v. Adam J. Rodgers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 19, 2018·No. 2192 DD3·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter Of : No. 2192 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : : No. 215 DB 2015 ADAM J. RODGERS : : Attorney Registration No. 64987 : : (Philadelphia)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2018, on certification by the Disciplinary

Board that Adam J. Rodgers, who was suspended for a period of three months, has

filed a verified statement showing compliance with the Order of Suspension and

Pa.R.D.E. 217, and there being no other outstanding order of suspension or

disbarment, Adam J. Rodgers shall resume active status, subject to the terms of

probation, as outlined in this Court’s order dated June 1, 2016.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ODC, Pet v. Adam J. Rodgers, (Pa. 2018).

ODC, Pet v. Adam J. Rodgers (ODC, Pet v. Adam J. Rodgers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.