O'Day v. J. Chris. G. Hupfel Brewing Co.
This text of 30 Misc. 460 (O'Day v. J. Chris. G. Hupfel Brewing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole question presented on this appeal concerns the sufficiency of the proof of corporate existence. Such defect as existed has been obviated by proof presented on this appeal, ■and, being record evidence, is under the authorities admissible for the purpose of sustaining the judgment below. Dunford v. Weaver, 84 N. Y. 445; Munoz v. Wilson, 111 id. 299; Dunham v. Townshend, 118 id. 281; Bank of Charleston v. Emeric, 2 Sandf. 718. The judgment should be affirmed. -
Present: Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 Misc. 460, 62 N.Y.S. 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oday-v-j-chris-g-hupfel-brewing-co-nyappterm-1900.