O'Day v. J. Chris. G. Hupfel Brewing Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

O'Day v. J. Chris. G. Hupfel Brewing Co.

30 Misc. 460, 62 N.Y.S. 473

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 15, 1900·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam..

The sole question presented on this appeal concerns the sufficiency of the proof of corporate existence. Such defect as existed has been obviated by proof presented on this appeal, ■and, being record evidence, is under the authorities admissible for the purpose of sustaining the judgment below. Dunford v. Weaver, 84 N. Y. 445; Munoz v. Wilson, 111 id. 299; Dunham v. Townshend, 118 id. 281; Bank of Charleston v. Emeric, 2 Sandf. 718. The judgment should be affirmed. -

Present: Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam..

The sole question presented on this appeal concerns the sufficiency of the proof of corporate existence. Such defect as existed has been obviated by proof presented on this appeal, ■and, being record evidence, is under the authorities admissible for the purpose of sustaining the judgment below. Dunford v. Weaver, 84 N. Y. 445; Munoz v. Wilson, 111 id. 299; Dunham v. Townshend, 118 id. 281; Bank of Charleston v. Emeric, 2 Sandf. 718. The judgment should be affirmed. -

Present: Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

O'Day v. J. Chris. G. Hupfel Brewing Co., 30 Misc. 460, 62 N.Y.S. 473 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

30 Misc. 460 (O'Day v. J. Chris. G. Hupfel Brewing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related