O'Daniel v. Pennsylvania R.
162 F.2d 414
This text of 162 F.2d 414 (O'Daniel v. Pennsylvania R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O'Daniel v. Pennsylvania R., 162 F.2d 414 (3d Cir. 1947).
Opinion
This unfortunate death case is governed by the law of Pennsylvania. In his opinion in the district court denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial Judge Kirkpatrick correctly stated and applied that law. 72 F.Supp. 15. For the reasons stated in his opinion, which we adopt, the judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
O'Daniel v. Pennsylvania R.
72 F. Supp. 15 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1946)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
162 F.2d 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odaniel-v-pennsylvania-r-ca3-1947.