Odam v. Beard

1 Blackf. 191, 1822 Ind. LEXIS 19
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 20, 1822·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

AN assignee against an assignor of a sealed note. Assignment as follows: — “For value received, I do hereby assign all my right to the within note to Jesse Beard, Feb. 20, 1820. — David Odam.”' The plaintiff had previously sued the maker, who proved to be insolvent. Held, that parol evidence was inadmissible to show that the assignment was without recourse (1).

Held, also, Holman J. dissentiente, that if the maker was solvent at the term when the assignee might have obtained judg[192] ment against him but for a defect in the declaration, and if that defect occasioned a continuance whereby the plaintiff failed to obtain the money, from the maker, the assignor was not liable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Odam v. Beard, 1 Blackf. 191, 1822 Ind. LEXIS 19 (Ind. 1822).

1 Blackf. 191 (Odam v. Beard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matchett v. Anderson Foundry & Machine Works
64 N.E. 229 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1902)
Thompson v. Campbell
23 N.E. 267 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)
Foglesong v. Wickard
75 Ind. 258 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Durland v. Pitcairn
51 Ind. 426 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1875)
Roberts v. Masters
40 Ind. 461 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1872)
Dale v. Gear
38 Conn. 15 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1871)
New Albany & Salem Railroad v. Fields
10 Ind. 187 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1858)
Bowers v. Headen
4 Ind. 318 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1853)
Overturf v. Martin
2 Ind. 507 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1851)
Jacobs v. Finkel
7 Blackf. 432 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1845)
Blair v. Williams
7 Blackf. 132 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1844)
Wilson v. Black
6 Blackf. 509 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1843)
Litchfield v. Falconer
2 Ala. 280 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1841)
Burge v. Dishman
5 Blackf. 272 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1840)