Odah v. United States

District of Columbia

Odah v. United States

355 F. Supp. 2d 482, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2050, 2005 WL 326864

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedFebruary 7, 2005

DocketCIV.A. 02-CV0828 (CKK), CIV.A. 04-CV1254 (HHK)

StatusPublished

This text of 355 F. Supp. 2d 482 (Odah v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Odah v. United States, 355 F. Supp. 2d 482, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2050, 2005 WL 326864 (D.D.C. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER GRANTING STAY PENDING APPEAL

JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.

Upon consideration of the Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Stay Pending Appeal filed by the plaintiff-petitioners in Al Odah v. Bush, 02-CV-0828 (CKK), and joined by the petitioners in Abdah v. Bush, 04-CV-1254 (HKK), in light of the substantial resources that would be expended and the significant burdens that would be incurred should this litigation go forward, and upon recognition that a reversal of this Court’s January 31, 2005 rulings would avoid the expenditure of such resources and incurrence of such burdens, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Stay Pending Appeal is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER GRANTING STAY PENDING APPEAL

JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.

Upon consideration of the Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Stay Pending Appeal filed by the plaintiff-petitioners in Al Odah v. Bush, 02-CV-0828 (CKK), and joined by the petitioners in Abdah v. Bush, 04-CV-1254 (HKK), in light of the substantial resources that would be expended and the significant burdens that would be incurred should this litigation go forward, and upon recognition that a reversal of this Court’s January 31, 2005 rulings would avoid the expenditure of such resources and incurrence of such burdens, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Stay Pending Appeal is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

355 F. Supp. 2d 482, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2050, 2005 WL 326864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odah-v-united-states-dcd-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack