Odah v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Odah v. United States

103 F. App'x 676

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided July 19, 2004·No. Nos. 02-5251, 02-5284, 02-5288·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

It is ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that, in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Rasul v. Bush, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2686, 159 L.Ed.2d 548 (2004), the court’s judgment filed March 11, 2003, in the above-captioned consolidated cases be vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court appealed from in these causes be reversed and these cases remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the Supreme Court’s opinion in Rasul v. Bush, 124 S.Ct. 2686 (2004). The Clerk is direct-. ed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

It is ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that, in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Rasul v. Bush, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2686, 159 L.Ed.2d 548 (2004), the court’s judgment filed March 11, 2003, in the above-captioned consolidated cases be vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court appealed from in these causes be reversed and these cases remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the Supreme Court’s opinion in Rasul v. Bush, 124 S.Ct. 2686 (2004). The Clerk is direct-. ed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Odah v. United States, 103 F. App'x 676 (D.C. Cir. 2004).

Pincite

103 F. App'x 676 (Odah v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related