O.D. Van Duren, Jr. v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: February 20, 2014
• Docket: 01-13-00103-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-13-00103-CR Style: O.D. VanDuren v The State of Texas Date motion filed: September 9, 2013 Type of motion: Motion to Supplement Record Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Supplemental Reporter’s Record or Information Sheet

Ordered that motion is:  Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: On September 9, 2013, appellant filed his “Motion Relating to Informalities in the Record” requesting inclusion of various items in supplements to the record. Appellant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.

The Court orders the court reporter to file, within 21 days of this order, either (1) a supplemental reporter’s record containing “[t]ranscripts of hearings on motions to withdraw filed by attorneys Ruth Burton and Mark Lipkin” or (2) an information sheet certifying that no such records exist. All other requests by appellant to supplement the record are denied.

Judge's signature:/s/ Justice Jane Bland 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: February 20, 2014

November 7, 2008 Revision