Ocwen Federal Bank v. Navin

Connecticut Appellate Court

Ocwen Federal Bank v. Navin

804 A.2d 247, 70 Conn. App. 910, 2002 Conn. App. LEXIS 381

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedJuly 9, 2002

DocketAC 22167

StatusPublished

This text of 804 A.2d 247 (Ocwen Federal Bank v. Navin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ocwen Federal Bank v. Navin, 804 A.2d 247, 70 Conn. App. 910, 2002 Conn. App. LEXIS 381 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant Patrick J. Berkerey, a subsequent mortgagee, appeals from the judgment of foreclosure by sale rendered by the trial court. The defendant claims, inter alia, that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to accept his appraiser’s opinion concerning the fair market value of the property and in ordering a foreclosure by sale. On the basis of our thorough examination of the record, we conclude that the trial court acted within its discretion in determining the value of the property and in ordering foreclosure by sale. The defendant has offered no plausible argument supporting his claim that the trial court abused its discretion in any respect.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant Patrick J. Berkerey, a subsequent mortgagee, appeals from the judgment of foreclosure by sale rendered by the trial court. The defendant claims, inter alia, that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to accept his appraiser’s opinion concerning the fair market value of the property and in ordering a foreclosure by sale. On the basis of our thorough examination of the record, we conclude that the trial court acted within its discretion in determining the value of the property and in ordering foreclosure by sale. The defendant has offered no plausible argument supporting his claim that the trial court abused its discretion in any respect.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

804 A.2d 247, 70 Conn. App. 910, 2002 Conn. App. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ocwen-federal-bank-v-navin-connappct-2002.