Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Bassi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Bassi

294 A.D.2d 478, 742 N.Y.S.2d 850, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5198

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 20, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 294 A.D.2d 478 (Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Bassi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Bassi, 294 A.D.2d 478, 742 N.Y.S.2d 850, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5198 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants George Bassi and Elizabeth Bassi appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered May 21, 2001, which granted the plaintiffs motion for a writ of assistance, and denied their cross motion, inter alia, to vacate a referee’s deed, set aside a foreclosure sale, and order a new foreclosure sale subject to their right of redemption.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A court possesses broad equitable powers to set aside a foreclosure sale where fraud, collusion, mistake, or misconduct casts doubt on the fairness of the sale (see Provident Sav. Bank v Bordes, 244 AD2d 470). No such misconduct occurred here. Moreover, the appellant mortgagors lack standing to object to the referee’s variance from the time of the essence term of sale with the successful bidder (see Scheckter v Emigrant Sav. Bank, 237 AD2d 273). In any event, the appellants’ facially improper, redundant, second bankruptcy filing was directly responsible for the delay in the closing of the foreclosure sale until after the law date specified in the terms of sale, and thus, they may not be heard to complain of this delay (see SRF Bldrs. Capital Corp. v Ventura, 224 AD2d 678).

[479]*479The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, Goldstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants George Bassi and Elizabeth Bassi appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered May 21, 2001, which granted the plaintiffs motion for a writ of assistance, and denied their cross motion, inter alia, to vacate a referee’s deed, set aside a foreclosure sale, and order a new foreclosure sale subject to their right of redemption.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A court possesses broad equitable powers to set aside a foreclosure sale where fraud, collusion, mistake, or misconduct casts doubt on the fairness of the sale (see Provident Sav. Bank v Bordes, 244 AD2d 470). No such misconduct occurred here. Moreover, the appellant mortgagors lack standing to object to the referee’s variance from the time of the essence term of sale with the successful bidder (see Scheckter v Emigrant Sav. Bank, 237 AD2d 273). In any event, the appellants’ facially improper, redundant, second bankruptcy filing was directly responsible for the delay in the closing of the foreclosure sale until after the law date specified in the terms of sale, and thus, they may not be heard to complain of this delay (see SRF Bldrs. Capital Corp. v Ventura, 224 AD2d 678).

[479]*479The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, Goldstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 A.D.2d 478, 742 N.Y.S.2d 850, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ocwen-federal-bank-fsb-v-bassi-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack