Octavio Alvarez v. Sergio Molina D/B/A Narse Construction

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 9, 2018
Docket13-17-00086-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Octavio Alvarez v. Sergio Molina D/B/A Narse Construction (Octavio Alvarez v. Sergio Molina D/B/A Narse Construction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Octavio Alvarez v. Sergio Molina D/B/A Narse Construction, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-17-00086-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

OCTAVIO ALVAREZ, Appellant,

v.

SERGIO MOLINA D/B/A NARSE CONSTRUCTION, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7 of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Contreras, Longoria, and Hinojosa Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa

Appellant Octavio Alvarez appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing his suit

against appellee Sergio Molina d/b/a Narse Construction for want of prosecution. This

Court previously abated the appeal to allow the parties to effectuate a settlement

agreement. The parties have now filed a joint motion to enter agreed judgment. Pursuant to the agreement, the parties request this Court to render judgment effectuating

the parties’ agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). The parties have agreed that

this Court should reverse the trial court’s judgment and render judgment in favor of

appellant and against appellee in the amount of $17,000.00. The parties further agree

that all costs of the appeal will be taxed against the party incurring same.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and joint motion to enter

agreed judgment, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, we

REINSTATE this appeal. We GRANT the parties’ joint motion to enter agreed judgment.

We REVERSE the trial court’s judgment, RENDER judgment in favor of appellant and

against appellee in the amount of $17,000.00, and DISMISS the appeal. See id.

Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, the costs of the appeal will be taxed against the

incurring party. See id. 42.1(d). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties' request,

no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. We

dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

LETICIA HINOJOSA Justice

Delivered and filed the 9th day of August, 2018.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Octavio Alvarez v. Sergio Molina D/B/A Narse Construction, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/octavio-alvarez-v-sergio-molina-dba-narse-construction-texapp-2018.