Octavia Sharrell McGee v. Camillo ML 2021 SFR, LLC
This text of Octavia Sharrell McGee v. Camillo ML 2021 SFR, LLC (Octavia Sharrell McGee v. Camillo ML 2021 SFR, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-22-00314-CV __________________
OCTAVIA SHARRELL MCGEE, Appellant
V.
CAMILLO ML 2021 SFR, LLC, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 22-32799 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In September 2022, the trial court signed a judgment ordering Octavia Sharrell
McGee to surrender possession and to pay unpaid rent on the premises, located at
25758 Hazy Elm Lane, Porter, Texas. After the trial court signed the judgment,
McGee filed a notice of appeal, and in a separate document, requested that the
judgment be reversed.
On April 3, 2023, we notified McGee that the document we received failed to
comply with the requirements of a brief and lacked the required certificate of service.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5(e), 38.1. We warned McGee that she must send a copy of
each document she filed to the appellee and submit a certificate of service. We
further notified McGee that she could file an amended brief provided she did so no
later than April 13, 2023.
On April 27, 2023, we notified the parties that McGee had not filed a brief
and that her appeal would be submitted without briefs unless, by May 8, 2023, we
received a brief together with a motion to extend the time she is allowed to file a
brief. We also warned McGee that her appeal could be dismissed for want of
prosecution if her appeal was submitted without briefs.
On May 23, 2023, we notified the parties that on June 13, 2023, the appeal
would be submitted on the record alone without briefs and without oral argument.
See id. 39.8. In the absence of a brief assigning error, we dismiss McGee’s appeal
for want of prosecution. See id. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on June 13, 2023 Opinion Delivered June 22, 2023
Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Octavia Sharrell McGee v. Camillo ML 2021 SFR, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/octavia-sharrell-mcgee-v-camillo-ml-2021-sfr-llc-texapp-2023.