Home/Supreme Court of Oklahoma/Oct Equipment, Inc. v. Ferrell

Oct Equipment, Inc. v. Ferrell

2005 OK 38, 143 P.3d 202, 76 O.B.A.J. 1228, 2005 Okla. LEXIS 34, 2005 WL 1213889
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 23, 2005·No. No. 101,277·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

ORDER

¶ 1 The petition of CompSource Oklahoma for certiorari is denied.

¶ 2 In cases where CompSource Oklahoma is representing an insured that is also an agency, department, or branch of state government, no filing fee for any review proceeding, appeal, original action, or petition for certiorari will be required. When Comp-Source Oklahoma is representing an insured that is a private enterprise, the standard filing fee will be required for the initiation of any review proceeding, appeal or original action, or the filing of a petition for certiora-ri. In cases where CompSource Oklahoma is initiating an appeal or original action on its own behalf, a filing fee will not be required.

ALL JUSTICES CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oct Equipment, Inc. v. Ferrell, 2005 OK 38, 143 P.3d 202, 76 O.B.A.J. 1228, 2005 Okla. LEXIS 34, 2005 WL 1213889 (Okla. 2005).

2005 OK 38 (Oct Equipment, Inc. v. Ferrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southern Material Handling Co. v. Falling
2006 OK CIV APP 81 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2006)
Energy Exchanger Co. v. Hill
2006 OK CIV APP 56 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2006)
Anderson Mechanical, Inc. v. Spiegel
2005 OK CIV APP 60 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2005)
Keco, Inc. v. Hayward
2005 OK CIV APP 53 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2005)