Oconto County v. Lindgren

143 N.W. 707, 155 Wis. 303, 1913 Wisc. LEXIS 321
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 28, 1913
StatusPublished

This text of 143 N.W. 707 (Oconto County v. Lindgren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oconto County v. Lindgren, 143 N.W. 707, 155 Wis. 303, 1913 Wisc. LEXIS 321 (Wis. 1913).

Opinion

The following opinion was filed October 28, 1913:

Timlin, J.

This case is in all respects similar to the cases of Oconto Co. v. MacAllister, ante, p. 286, 143 N. W. 702, except that the term of the county treasurer, Lindgren, expired on the first Monday of January, 1905, and except as to amounts. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and after the time for amending had expired judgment was entered thereon dismissing the complaint, and from this judgment the appeal is taken.

[304]*304The case is ruled hy Oconto Co. v. MacAllister, ante, p. 286, 143 N. W. 702, and the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.

By the Court. — It is so ordered.

A motion for a rehearing was made in this case, hut was after-wards abandoned.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oconto County v. MacAllister
143 N.W. 702 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 N.W. 707, 155 Wis. 303, 1913 Wisc. LEXIS 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconto-county-v-lindgren-wis-1913.