Oconto County v. Lindgren

143 N.W. 707, 155 Wis. 303, 1913 Wisc. LEXIS 321
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided October 28, 1913·Published

Opinion

The following opinion was filed October 28, 1913:

Timlin, J.

This case is in all respects similar to the cases of Oconto Co. v. MacAllister, ante, p. 286, 143 N. W. 702, except that the term of the county treasurer, Lindgren, expired on the first Monday of January, 1905, and except as to amounts. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and after the time for amending had expired judgment was entered thereon dismissing the complaint, and from this judgment the appeal is taken.

[304]*304The case is ruled hy Oconto Co. v. MacAllister, ante, p. 286, 143 N. W. 702, and the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.

By the Court. — It is so ordered.

A motion for a rehearing was made in this case, hut was after-wards abandoned.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oconto County v. Lindgren, 143 N.W. 707, 155 Wis. 303, 1913 Wisc. LEXIS 321 (Wis. 1913).

143 N.W. 707 (Oconto County v. Lindgren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oconto County v. MacAllister
143 N.W. 702 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1914)