O'Connor v. Young

207 F. App'x 332
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 28, 2006·No. Nos. 06-1699, 06-1791, 06-1851·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn E. O’Connor appeals the district court’s orders dismissing as frivolous her employment discrimination complaint and denying her motions for reconsideration and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and [333]*333dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. See O’Connor v. Young, No. 3:06-cv-00330-HEH (E.D. Va. May 31, 2006; June 27, 2006; June 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Connor v. Young, 207 F. App'x 332 (4th Cir. 2006).

207 F. App'x 332 (O'Connor v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.