O'Connor v. Yardley Golf Club

171 F.2d 40, 23 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2150
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided November 26, 1948·No. No. 9655·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only question which requires discussion in the instant case is whether the plaintiff was an employee of the defendant within the meaning of Section 8(e) of the Selective Training and Service Act, 50 U.S. C.A.Appendix, § 308(e). As this court stated in Kay v. General Cable Corporation, 144 F.2d 653, 654, the provisions of the statute are to be liberally interpreted in favor of the veteran. Having this in mind and after ^careful consideration of the briefs and the points raised by counsel at the oral argument we are convinced that the court below committed no error in holding that the plaintiff was “in the employ” of the defendant.

Accordingly the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Connor v. Yardley Golf Club, 171 F.2d 40, 23 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2150 (3d Cir. 1948).

171 F.2d 40 (O'Connor v. Yardley Golf Club) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reeser v. Philadelphia National League Club
84 F. Supp. 947 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1949)