O'Connor v. Wolff

794 N.E.2d 66, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1528
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 18, 2003
Docket2003-0996
StatusPublished

This text of 794 N.E.2d 66 (O'Connor v. Wolff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Connor v. Wolff, 794 N.E.2d 66, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1528 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Rupert A. Doan, J., of the First Appellate District, sitting for Moyer, C. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
794 N.E.2d 66, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnor-v-wolff-ohio-2003.