O'Connor v. United States

Fourth Circuit

O'Connor v. United States

585 F. App'x 65

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 23, 2014·No. No. 14-1643·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn E. O’Connor appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis because she failed to comply with the prefiling injunction imposed by that court in 2006. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. O’Connor v. United States, No. 3:14-mc-00003-JRS (E.D.Va. June 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn E. O’Connor appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis because she failed to comply with the prefiling injunction imposed by that court in 2006. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. O’Connor v. United States, No. 3:14-mc-00003-JRS (E.D.Va. June 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

O'Connor v. United States, 585 F. App'x 65 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

585 F. App'x 65 (O'Connor v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.