O'Connor v. Sowles

57 Vt. 470
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedJanuary 15, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 57 Vt. 470 (O'Connor v. Sowles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Connor v. Sowles, 57 Vt. 470 (Vt. 1885).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Rowkll, J.

The defendant moved for a verdict in his favor, for that the plaintiff, by her own conduct, was estopped from maintaining the action. The court overruled the motion; whereupon the defendant declined to go to the jury on any question; and thereupon the court submitted the case to the jury on the question of damages only; to all which the defendant excepted.

By declining to go to the jury, the defendant admitted as proved all that the plaintiff’s evidence tended to show; hence, the only contention he can now make is, that if all is true that her testimony tended to show, she cannot recover. But he makes no such contention; hut only contends that he was entitled to go to the jury on the question of estoppel. Hambelt v. Bliss, 55 Vt. 535.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Varnum v. Town of Highgate
65 Vt. 416 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 Vt. 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnor-v-sowles-vt-1885.